"The greatest wisdom is in simplicity, love, respect, tolerance, sharing, gratitude, forgiveness.
It's not complex or elaborate. The real knowledge is free. It's encoded in your DNA. All you need is WITHIN YOU. Great teachers have said that from the beginning. Find your heart, and you will find your way." - Carlos Barrios, author of Kam Wuj
Psa. 89:14 “Justice and
judgment are the habitation of thy throne : mercy and truth shall go before thy
PRESS RELEASE For
October 3, 2014
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Administrator David E. Robinson, 207-798-4695
UNIFIED MAINE COMMON LAW GRAND JURY
3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine, 04011
LEX NATURALIS — DEI GRATIA
VETTED NOTICE TO THE
THIS NOTICE Challenges the
income tax, and the authority of, and the very existence of the Internal
Revenue Service. We offer this notice to you as a Caveat. Beware of being duped
by IRS people. They have no authority anywhere whatsoever. The only legal
offices of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue are in the District of
Columbia, and cannot be operated outside the District. All the outlying offices
were abolished in 2001.
Please read this notice
carefully, and send it to any IRS office that you believe has any authority
over you to collect taxes for the Commissioner, in the District of Columbia.
Most Americans operate on unfounded presumptions that the IRS has authority to collect
taxes or to compel others to collect taxes for it. Chances are, you may feel
compelled because others told you that you are compelled, and not because
you’ve actually read the law for yourself.
The IRS has never been
authorized to collect taxes or enforce any laws. And since March 9th, 2001, the
Commissioner has had no legitimate Offices outside of the District of Columbia.
But the IRS continues to pretend to be the nation’s tax collector, using the
United States Mails to extort money from the public.
In August of 2003, Ms.
Vernice Kuglin was acquitted of several charges of “willful failure to file”
and “false information on W-4’s” because Ms. Kuglin had asked the government to
produce the taxing statute that made her liable to do so, and the government
had failed or refused to produce it. And it seems that there are at lease two
other cases that are similar in nature. In U.S.A. v. Lloyd Long, in
1993, a similar verdict was reached by a jury in Tennessee. Prior to that, in
1991, John Cheek (Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192) argued
before the Supreme Court, which held that since the government had not produced
the required taxing statute, that he could not be convicted of willfulness.
Thus it is now res
judicata that the government cannot produce the taxing statute,
i.e.,“the issue’s been definitively settled by judicial decision.”
The government cannot
produce the taxing statute because Congress repealed all the internal revenue
laws in 1939, and has never re-enacted them. The Code of 1954 did not, and
could not, repeal or modify the Code of 1939, hence it is not a code of laws;
its unenforceable as law. Hence we demand that the President, his Cabinet, the
Congress and the Judiciary, examine the facts presented here and either rebut
the facts and conclusions or admit that there is no “internal revenue law” to
enforce. And even if there were, that the IRS could not enforce it.
We accuse the United
States Government of perpetrating a hoax upon the American people that has
reduced all of us to a condition of involuntary servitude in violation of the
Thirteenth Amendment and federal laws found at 18 USC 1581, and 42 USC 1994.
Millions of us in the states of the Union living OUTSIDE of the federal
legislative jurisdiction involuntarily pay tribute to the federal government
annually in order to avoid having our property taken from us by IRS mail,
rather than the court orders required under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
IRS letters are more
powerful than any law, or any court order, but they lack legal authority. By
these bogus letters and the illegal responses to them by fearful employers and
banks everywhere, the IRS has exceeded its delegated authority to become an
illegal enforcement agency, and hence a financial terrorist protected
from its wrongdoing by corrupted federal courts, by abusing official and
sovereign immunity over the District of Columbia. An examination of the
Treasury Organization Chart, found in the 2003 U.S. Government Manual on p.
339, reveals that the IRS is NOT an enforcement agency, since it does not come
under the Undersecretary for Enforcement as all other Treasury enforcement
related activity does.
In 1944, the then
Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve, Beardsley Ruml, gave a speech to the
American Bar Association, entitled “Taxes for Revenue are Obsolete”. In his
speech to the Bar, he said that taxes for revenue purposes are obsolete,
because the government could now print all the money it needed to
pay its bills. It could use taxes for other purposes, such as
implementing “national policies” for other things.
The recent Kuglin case
puts the government on notice that the best defense the people have against
suits for non-filing or non-compliance with “the tax laws” is to demand a copy
of the taxing statute, which the government cannot provide. It is
shameful for the government to prosecute people for violating laws it cannot
produce. We have become the laughingstock of the planet as a
result. To permit such idiotic things to occur makes the United States an embarrassment
to the people they theoretically serve. We all should be
embarrassed. In light of the recent Kuglin case, the question we all have, now,
is “what federal law imposes a tax on me, my activity, or my property?” More
precisely, “where is the taxing statute that is represented by the Code, that
imposes the alleged tax on me, my property, or my activities?” If the
government fails to produce the un-repealed taxing statute, it can never
convict anyone for violating it ever again.
The Act of 1939 repealed
all the taxing statutes, but the Bureau of Internal Revenue continued to mail
out tax returns for the “tax year” 1939-1940 and subsequent years, even though
those years were not “tax years”. Treasury Order 150-02 cancelled all the
outlying offices of the IRS, but nobody told the IRS. They think
they’re still in business.
We bring these matters
to your attention because it is only a matter of time before people start
reading the laws for themselves, and discover what government officials and
their predecessors have done, promoted, or simply permitted to happen. They
directly or indirectly have led the American people to believe lies about the
law, promulgated, or permitted by them and those who carry out their orders.
This whole mess is the
responsibility of the President to admit to and clean up under Article 2,
Section 1, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution. It is his appointees and
employees who are perpetrating this hoax, and it is his duty to take care that
the laws of the United States, made in pursuance of the U.S. Constitution, are
It is time for the
President of the United States, Congress, and the Justices, to “fess up” and
admit that there is no “income tax law” codified in the Code of 1954, yet they
have allowed us to believe, or promoted the notion, that the Code is real,
honest-to-goodness law. Even to this day, Congressmen continue to mail their
constituents letters in response to their tax questions assuring them that the
Sixteenth Amendment authorizes the federal government to collect taxes on
labor. They tell this bald-faced lie in spite of the fact that the Supreme
Court has admitted many different times that the Sixteenth Amendment “conferred
no new power of taxation.” (See Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240
U.S. 103 (1916)).
You must admit that the
IRS is out of business, and that the Secretary of the Treasury and the
Commissioner do not have constitutional power to collect taxes. The Secretary
is an accountant, not a cop. The Congress is still the nation’s tax collector.
It is just not doing its job right now. Soon, the IRS will be gone, and with it
the false belief that the people must pay tribute to a foreign government (The
Crown) through that instrumentality of injustice, or be ruined by it. We seem
to be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. But the Constitution says that
they cannot tax people or their property directly. Whether there ever was a tax
on all the people or their activities or their property, if it was an “Internal
Revenue law” the taxing statute no longer exists, and had no “force of law”
after the “tax year” 1938.
We challenge anybody to
disprove that all the official documents cited herein, and our conclusions
drawn from them, by providing us with the taxing statutes enacted between 1939
and 1954 that were codified in and underlie the “Code of 1954″.
Please provide us with a
considered timely response. We are fed up with “the tax laws are
constitutional”or other irrelevant assertions made by ignorant IRS employees or
public officials. If you can’t show us the taxing statute, then you must admit
that we, as a nation, have a problem, and need to face it and work to get rid
of it together. Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.
VETTED NOTICE TO THE
We the Unified Maine
Common Law Grand Jury fully concur with the above Vetted Notice To The World: